confessions of a fatalist

•April 2, 2009 • Leave a Comment

I work for a company that proudly touts the phrase “a better everyday life for the many”. While I strongly believe in the sentiment of this mantra and I willingly co-opt it as my own – my experience of being just one of many today is to live overwhelmed by the magnitude of our collective maelstrom of humanity. To exist as a seedling of this species offers a share in the extensive history of destruction that we have inflicted upon the earth. I am implicated by my existence, a guilty participant of the gigantisms of our civilized ills. I am rendered impotent by my miniscule proportion to the masses and yet I am intuitively endowed with the notion of a possible and necessary change. I am seeking to infiltrate the doings of the “many” in order to harness the power of this sleeping giant.

 

 Who am I the small?

The most frightening aspect of being one amongst billions is just that. The proportion of an individual against the backdrop of masses, of the many, renders the one undeniably insignificant. Not only are you only one amongst the billions of your time, but one amongst the exponential human kind, past, present and future. What is our place together here now? What is our place against the tomorrow if it comes, and against the past of which we are gifted an inherited omniscience. The experience of being the miniscule one in body and ability, but with the accessible awareness and knowledge of the entirety of our species swarming in the mind. The totality of a collective consciousness can be carried by the many but is crushing to each and everyone, rendering us as individuals terrified and paralyzed.

My North American experience of the world led me to discover my arrogant individualism only when I stepped away from my spacious and youthful culture to visit and work in Japan. Here I recognized immediately the insignificance of my own self. If your single winged butterfly can cause tropical storms – it cannot touch the history and largess magnitude that lays upon the sizably small island of Japan. Such a place invokes the experience of a gravitron ride – spinning, spinning, wild imagery but pinned to your leaden physicality. Here is a place where one could live unnoticed and irrelevant for a lifetime, but yet free in a way that I cannot touch – valued for a lack of individuality, valued for dedicated participation and contribution – and for protecting a calm and unfurled daily life of the many, many, many.

I reflect upon my experience in Japan specifically because it was where I recognized that any localized effort, passion, or intent that I might have lived and proclaimed in relation to my intense desire for an epic rescue of my world was embarrassingly futile and childish when held up to the global reality. This world I experienced in Japan had long surpassed the quality of life we were dreaming of, had long out populated us per sq/m and lived well. They lived well! This many, this mass of people lived in a way that western alarmist concerns rail against as an inevitable disaster. But Japan is tightly packed, is a frenzy of material consumerism, is all city, all industrial, a 24 hours spinning ride of human construct. And yet there is nature, there is quietude, there is civility and there is an uncanny appreciation for simplicity and handmade quality. Where you imagine the future in which we consume pills instead of meals, and we live faceless in tiny cubicles stacked upon each other already exists. It already exists and I am of no consequence.

The fright of becoming irrelevant. My carefully engineered stance as a consumer activist, as a vegetarian, a cultural creative, a subversive at heart, my self idealized siege of change lays flaccid at my feet and trampled by the masses.

Here lay the death of my soloist career in counter culture. Here lie the petty projects, the composted contributions, the recycled wardrobe, the vegan restaurants, the organic cat food, the city hall meetings, the cycled kilometres, the reusable mugs, the natural toothpaste, the baking soda tub scrub. Here lies the decades of tireless crusade to make changes that amounted to no more than an iron deficiency and a waste related guilt complex.

Who am I the seed of my intent?

Here is the epoch of my transformation. Here is the moment of my utter despair at the notion of witnessing a man made apocalypse. Here I lie in terrified paralysis. Here is the moment when I break in to the world of the “many” and I must participate to survive.

Who am I the witness?

I am an artist. I am skilled of hand and a natural voyeur. I stand against the paintings, I stand against my nightmarish visions of material anxiety. Alone I would drive to the outskirts of industrial areas and pen the encroaching monstrous landscape of rusting metal car parts, dried grasses and complex structures of shipping containers and mechanism. The horrendous scale of these isolated geographies adhered both awe and ache to my paintings. This was the message I believed could draw attention. This was my purpose. Look! Look at the beauty of our terrifying madness! Look at the landscape once revered for its wild uncontrollable mystery! Look what we have done! Look at the frenetic living beast that shapes itself beyond our control while of our making! Look what we are capable of and look how it looms just out of view.

I collect things. I collect materials of interest. I cling to the potentiality that they offer for future projects. I store things that may one day be reused or diverted from the landfill. I live amongst fabrics, metals, plastics and paints. I hoard. I scrape tiles from walls and salvage building parts. I neatly and tightly pack storage unit after storage unit with the means to the future. I keep cabinets of canned food for the post apocalyptic moment of relief when I may implement my contingency plan. Somewhere inside this amounts to altruism. I am trying to save something. I am trying to fulfill a role as the impresario of waste.

I once lived in an attic above an elderly man who was left a house in trust. In his life previous he was homeless by his own favour. He had a deep passion for collecting and repurposing. He would gleefully offer up cables, fabrics, telephones, cat toys, an endless list of items provided upon request. He rarely left his home but for the lengthy expeditions upon which curiosity and worry would arise as to his whereabouts. He rarely spoke to anyone. His name was James. His cat Priscilla.

Eventually during a sojourn, the realtor who was responsible for the property deemed his suite a fire hazard and had all of his belongings removed and disposed of. His shelter for the lost and displaced was desecrated. His love, his generosity, his acquisitions of potentiality trashed. Value or negative value? Items having once been desired, now discarded , now a liability. The crisis of our compulsive making, our worthless detritus, seen clearly only by an anxious few as for what they are. The beauty and horror of our creation. The birth of our industrious nature, cast aside for new blood, for new love. The absolutely heartless scorn and dismissal of James and his activism. James and his altruistic and humanitarian rehabilitation of the abandoned. This looming risk of fire, this critical state of acquisition speak volumes to the real inherent risks. The risks not to James, not to the house, not to the neighbourhood. The weeping pus of our deepest sore. We can flush the wound, we can disinfect our space, we can live with the mental clarity of minimalism.

Who am I, the saviour of waste?

Why are they James’ compulsions, his obsessions? This diabolical madness is only evidence of our excess, of our purposeless and frenzied consumption, digestion and waste of an absolute material vacuum of value.

James is a collector of shit. I am a collector of shit. This is regarded as mania.

Who am I the sell out?

To be an activist is to be the antagonist. To fight against and critique the many. To protect the many from the selected few. To paint the selected few as hero, as victim. To regard the goings ons, the doings of the institution, of the great machine as erroneous and as demon. To bare witness. To alert and sound alarm, to protect, to salvage, to rescue and to mourn. The underdog, the counter attack, the special interest, the sub category, the subordinate.

To rail against, to revolutionize, to render, to dissolve, to subvert or to surrender.

To solicit desire is to contribute to the pain. To create for the machine is to be of the machine yourself. To be a part of this mechanism is my unavoidable folly. To sell myself is to sell out.

Who am I the whore?

I gave myself to him. I gave my allegiance and I gave away my naiveté. I gave myself and I gained my power. I gained relevancy in his eyes. I was paid. I was employed. I was mechanized. I was easy to convert. I was sold a share in the belief that is for a greater good. I wanted the greater good. I wanted the better everyday life.

A company with values, a company with culture. I am part of the many. I have the privilege of responsibility. I can make a difference from the inside. I can be a leader. I can climb the ladder. I am of value. I can sell a bookcase. I can sell ten thousand bookcases. I contribute.

I have beliefs, I have morals, I have ethics. I am a consumer. I have consumer ethics. I want a better everyday more ethical life. I want to believe it can be true. I want to believe it is not a sham. I want a nice home, I want a functional workspace. I want a kitchen to dream about. I want this for the many. There are so many. I am frightened for the many. I am frightened by the many.

What is market value in relation to eternity? In relation to the earth? In relation to our salvation? In relation to our undoing, our failure, our crisis. The product, the material, the core resources. The items we seek to sell, the items we seek to buy. All of it deemed valuable by our collective desire or otherwise without value and therefore engaged as a burden. We shift, the perspective shifts. The trend empowers the plastics, the hemp, the organics, the recycled, the resourceful, the uncanny, the ironic.

What is market capital in relation to our purpose? To our humanity? Our shifting perspective, our demands, our satisfaction, our desires, our voice. Who to blame? The production to meet demands, the consumer subjectivities, the race to satiate and capitalize. To fulfil the needs. To take care of our assets, to take advantage of our competitive advantage.

Purchasing power. The sword of the consumer. The retail Joan of Arc throws up her arsenal of knowledge, her special interest, her consumer responsibility. She wants more, she wants accountability, she wants ethics. She wants a better everyday life – but not at the cost of many. She is answerable to. She is a force to be reckoned with. She is emancipated. She has credit.

 

I am startled by the apathy of most. I learn that my infernal questioning causes grief. I learn that I am not of the many. I sense that they are happy. I sense that they do not fear the end, that they do not cease to live because the end is near.

How can I contain my grief. How can I harness the potential. How do I learn to manipulate, to speak the language. How to I relieve myself of myself in order to engage them? How if I am to make change, if I am to participate in a last ditch effort to survive, to save myself, do I subvert the machine?

Who am I instrumental?

I become a leader. I make a puppet of myself. I perform a song and dance. I get my way. I smile and I show empowerment. I explain that a difference can be made. I propose that making a difference actually matters. I remind that it is the way of the value, the way of the culture. I report that it will save money. I congratulate the success. I make a difference. I make them make a difference, and then they make differences without me.

Have they changed me?

I wonder sometimes if the fight is worthwhile. Am I bailing out this sinking vessel with my tiny insignificant hands? Am I flailing about like a madman? Am I lost to the perspective needed to find the strength to stop and mourn the loss as it passes. To grieve and embrace the final moments of this life in awe, in lieu of the frantic efforts to resuscitate that diminish the fragile beauty of passing. Is this simply our time to go?

But I am not ready to let go. I organize. I craft strategy. We sort, we separate, we calculate. The awareness grows. The realization of the potential surfaces. The kilograms, the cost, the percentages. The improvements, the revisions. The minds of people change. The pet project becomes business acumen. The grassroots become concept document.

I had often longed for a reason. Longed for a different century, a mode of dress, of meaning. A world of historical significance, an ideal time of poetry and romance, of velvet and passion, of a painter’s salon, of a smoking jacket and cigar, of an English country side, of a colonial journey. A moment of inclusion in relevancy. A ticket across the ocean on a ship, a wartime bride, a radical on horseback, a weapon and a skill, a gun and a tank, a pen and an audience. Who am I the Queen of England. Who am I Elizabeth. Who am I the Pharaoh, the mathematician, the Van Gogh, the Einstein, the Medea. Who am I the milk maid. Who am I the Joan of Arc. Who am I a contribution.

I am but a shopping mall. I am a weekend between Monday thru Friday. I am a punch clock, a gas station, a television program. I am a uniform. I am a lanyard. I am my name tag. I am my rental apartment. I am a litter box and a refrigerator. I am inconsequential but I participate. I perform a function. I follow in footsteps. I am uncertainty. I am thirty. I am childless. I am alone.

I am afraid of the end. I am afraid not to matter.

Glory in the apocalypse. This is the time now. This is the reason you were born in this century of mediocrity. In this decade post activism, in this decade post meaning. In this time beyond turning back. In the time of revelation. Of forgiveness too late. Cling to the last tree. It knows you, it is you. Cling to this tree while the river swells around you and the wind storms against your resolve. You didn’t mean it. It didn’t mean anything. It meant everything.

You didn’t see it coming. We saved the best for last. A grand finale awaits. We spectators to our own gruesome and timely beheading. A suicide watch. Watching our own murder. How long after we are removed from our bodies are we conscious? How long will we gaze upon our illness and reflect upon our mistakes? When will the lights go out forever? When will it cease to matter?

The police line flaps in the breeze. No one to collect the evidence. A cold case file.

They are waiting for grandchildren. Waiting for babies. Waiting to throw offspring into the first circle of hell. Birthed into Limbo, land of the guiltless damned. Waiting for pomp and circumstance. Waiting to feel loved. Waiting to find out what life is really about. This is it, this is why you are here. To love and be loved, to make babies. To see them laugh and grow. To give them everything you never had. To give them the end of the world. To let them care for you while you choke on asphalt and sewage. To have them wipe your ass when you can no longer. To bury you in what is left. To weep at your cancerous wreckage. To resuscitate you to bear witness to the end. Its all you ever wanted.

Suicide. I am nothing. I am helpless. I am worthless. I am a disappointment to myself. I consider you. I consider you as an option. I have potential. I have potential and it is not enough.

Could this all be a farce? Could this climate change be a masterfully designed hoax? This earth I drive across is solid, unchanged. The mountains glare at me through waves of hot red sun and dust. I sweat. I have no air conditioning. I have what is provided to man. What man has raped from the earth. I speed across bellowing pop tunes and drinking in life. I am free. I flee. I am afraid of the truck driver. I am afraid of myself. I am afraid of the future.

 

The future.

 

Abandon all hope, ye who enter here”

 

The moon? I don’t believe you. I don’t believe you that we entered the turnstiles into outer space. I don’t believe you that we conquered the outer world and we are unable to keep this one afloat. Where is your evidence? Where are your more practical accomplishments? Do you perceive my inability to make rational judgements about reality? I am drowning and so are you. The moon is calling. It wants to be left alone.

Come hither. Come lose yourself in my entanglement. Come and I will ease your sorrows, I will take from you what you never wanted. What you never had. Find your way to my threshold and I will absorb your breath, your life. I nature. I forest of suicide. I, Aokigahara of the earthly world. I will be your doorstep into the ever after. I will be your chosen grave. I will be your only sense of power.

Invoke the mystery of the inexplicable draw. Join a brotherhood of death. Join a parade of sorrow. Take what is yours to take and what will be yours regardless. Take it and cease to contribute to my pain.

Jonestown, 1978. Peoples Temple. Mass suicide. Suicide murder. I am newly born. Don’t cry. This is no way for us to die. We must die with some dignity.

Thirty years. We must die with some dignity. Mass suicide or suicide murder?

Are we there yet? Are we dead yet? My beheaded self watches expressionless. In awe, in wonder. It is amazing. Life is amazing. Death is amazing. Murder is amazing. Suicide is rational. Suicide is what we are committing. Who will be saved? Will you join us in this seventh circle of Hell?

You walk past misery. You walk past agony writhing on the concrete armour of the earth. Is this dignity? Hastings Street. The unwritten circle of hell. The living breathing foreshadow of our sentencing. You will pay for this. We will pay with our selves, with our bodies, we will reap what we sow, we will agonize each in due time . The unimaginable suffering of acreage, of battery cages, of snouts and feathers and branches and reptilian scales. The burger mart. The drug mart. The money mart. The Wal-Mart.

The competition gets greener. The competition sparks competition. The intent appears to be winning. The natural beneficiary of our market system. The money comes, the ethics come, the people come. The grassroots activist is absorbed into the media, into the mainstream economics. The beaten, weathered upstream plight reaps offspring that reap offspring. The water rushes around my consciousness. Which way was I going? Which way am I swimming, which way should I be swimming? To swim upstream is to reap greater reward. The awareness grows. The value system takes root. The stewardship, the footprint. Leave it as you found it. I am lost now, I have done my part. I cant discern upstream from downstream. I want the greater good, I want the best for the many. I want that which is right. Did I hit my head against the rocks on this journey? Did anyone witness my intent? Which way was I going? Which way is right?

 

 

Corporate Responsibility. This movement in the face of countermovement is moving things for real this time. We scoff at green washing, we will not be fooled. We believe the companies and corporations are motivated only by greed. The counter culture movement is alive and feisty with resentment in the face of big box retailing and other massive vehicles of capitalist enterprise. But this corporate responsibility, isn’t this idea what we have been asking for? Did we secretly wish that the system would fall, would fail miserably and take all the blame? Could this naive and hopeful exercise really be the solution? Perhaps it is our only option in lieu of shutting down the entire economic system of which we glory in. Tear the choices and bargains and lifestyle from the many, I dare you. Tear from the haves what the have nots have not. Ration and redistribute. Or attempt to subvert this machine. Be realistic. Be efficient.

What do I mean by subvert? I convince myself to get inside, get inside a little deeper and really identify the bleak situation. To really seek out the evidence of ill intent. To prove to myself that the beast is hungry for destruction, that it stops for no one and that it will eat us alive. To be consumed by our ultimate obsession. A fable of morality waiting to unfold. We know how this ends.

You my love are my Frankenstein, I will lust for you, I will make you mine, I will chase you to the ends of the earth and endear you to all. I will have my way with you and when you outgrow me I will cast you out. I will wait fearful of the moment when you wreak your havoc and destroy your very maker. I will recklessly indulge in this theatre of looming disaster.

Who am I a leader?

But inside I find I no mastermind. I find no purposeful ill intent to harm. I found no hateful reduction of my concerns. I do find carelessness, I find misinformation, I find blindness and I find disinterest. I am dejected by this. Countermovement requires stubborn resistance. An open and willing foe is difficult to combat. Here was my space, my niche to fill. Here was the slow and agonizing journey of change. This process is taxing and heavy, it is filled little with tangible reward or acknowledgement. It is smiling in the face of obvious trivialities that demean or rattle the progress. It is smiling in the face of the many when they ask you what really is the point. When they doubt the relevancy of the success as I do, it is disguising the fear and inspiring the compliance. It is being the example of change, the example of the only direction that holds potentiality. This many, this everyone is a mass of denial and doubt. But they can be corralled and cajoled and engaged in unexpectedly fruitful ways. They will sort, they will take action, they will consider, they will create and they will find meaning. They will add value to the value added statements. They will make it their own. They will comply and they will communicate. They will collectively create consciousness.

 

Normalcy. I will quest for normalcy. Normalcy you tell me is the full circle experience of death and dying. Death and ending, it is all normal – so seek the quietude, seek the peace. Give yourself over to the experience of life and the death that you rail so hard against. Why do you fight? Let me show you something. Let me show you the way.

Are we still fitfully clinging to the slippery bank of denial? You cannot stay here for much longer friend. You are going to have to let go. You are going to have to accept the encroaching end.

I am afraid you wont experience everything I have to offer. I am afraid you wont see me inside and out. You have me, you had me. I am over to you now. I cant get through. I keep trying. I cling. I relish the abuse and the final chances to touch you. I am terrified. I know you have missed most of me. I am terrified. I have shown you the rabbit hole and you have passed me by. I have thrown myself at the loss and I cling to the end.

Grief. How can I not be waiting for the loss. How can I ape the comfort you need from me. The prelude to death. With warning and perspective does grief come after or before the loss.

 

I have no answers so I throw my arms around you and close my eyes against the pain. I have to taste of you, to smell of you, to ache for you before you are gone. I tear at the coming end. I rail against it. You are cold to me. You turn away. You saw this coming and you fake remorse. The landslide, the wash of waves, the winds of deliverance. The trees recede, the rain tears at my skin. The sun deceives with its warming touch – only to scald and blister after he is gone.

This is about changing minds. This is about changing behaviours. This is about gaining the momentum of the many through change. The mechanisms we might use in any of our feeble but valiant hearted attempts may not save us but will surely speak of our intent. If we fail will it matter? The brave gesture in the face of terror. I will not suggest that we go on drinking our cocktails and dancing on the ballroom deck as this ship goes down in the night. What a romantic and reasonable, rational end. What a beautiful and idealized moment to share. I will fight. I will fight while you carry on. I will scream at the waves crashing in, I will cling to your mast. I will agonize over the moments slipping through my fingers, of the dreams unlived as they sink the bottom. I will not ease my mind while you dance the end away. I will have missed the moment but I will remember everything.

This man has not yet seen his last evening; But, through his madness, was so close to it, That there was hardly time to turn about”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I work for a company that proudly touts the phrase “a better everyday life for the many”. While I strongly believe in the sentiment of this mantra and I willingly co-opt it as my own – my experience of being just one of many today is to live overwhelmed by the magnitude of our collective maelstrom of humanity. To exist as a seedling of this species offers a share in the extensive history of destruction that we have inflicted upon the earth. I am implicated by my existence, a guilty participant of the gigantisms of our civilized ills. I am rendered impotent by my miniscule proportion to the masses and yet I am intuitively endowed with the notion of a possible and necessary change. I am seeking to infiltrate the doings of the “many” in order to harness the power of this sleeping giant.

 

 

scotch tasting: a bittersweet finish

•April 6, 2008 • Leave a Comment

Who are we? What does it mean to be human, to be an individual and to be part of a collective? What is love and can it be egalitarian or must it be a painful disaster of passion? Is life even worth living? What is our relationship with the earth? In fact are we in contractual agreement with nature and does it rule us or is it our inherited rightful domain? Is science a corrupt institutional religion of its own or a wondrous example of our mastery of the universe through Reason – and is there any significant meaning or God who has left us to prove ourselves here? Is it simply a hedonistic palace of pleasure that we waste while ruminating over why, what and how? Where am I situated within myself? Am I myself at all or am I an explosive phantasmagoria of impersonal neural accidents within? Within my body, my brain or all of the above?

This course (GLS 800 & 801), in all its glory of interdisciplinarian chaos – has led me to less conclusive understanding of anything – but at the same time open a staggering multiplicity of new ways of looking at things via author after author after author. I don’t believe it was any God or Chaos or prederminate destiny or even an entirely autonomous Free Will that brought us together but rather an innumerable complex string of personal events and personality probability factors that collided to allow us this happy and rewarding event. A rather sentimental and tearful wave hit me last night as I looked at each and everyone of my classmates and teachers while we boisterously discussed this and that with our individual gesticulations of character.  I don’t want it to be over! Thank you!

The Wealth-Health Gradient

•April 5, 2008 • Leave a Comment

The Wealth-Health Gradient

I’ve been watching a four part program on PBS called “Unnatural Causes”. This series explores the relationship between social status and health in America. Disturbing conclusive statistics reveal a gradient scale that is predictive of lifespan based on the income level of an individual. Much of this information is not surprising however the immediate relationship and seemingly inevitable and unavoidable consequences is disconcerting. One who has greater economic status certainly has access to greater resources, education, healthier eating, reduced stress and leisure opportunities and this could be sensibly predictive of a certain degree of better well being; however the studies presented show the difference between income brackets can reduce a lifespan by several years – and the most extreme differential was more than ten years. My immediate reaction was to consider that an individual within any bracket could overcome such issues with a greater attention to self care or otherwise affect their own outcome through choice and free will, but in the case of those who live on lower hierarchical posts – the effect of subjective power is highly limited. The chemical reaction of stress on the brain in children and adults is permanently damaging and suppresses the immune system. This stress – while something encountered by all human beings – seems to fall into different categories based on the individual experience with the world. Stress as a CEO with ultimate control is different than stress as a middle class working professional a little lower on the hierarchy and then again different as someone who struggles to meet basics needs. Freedom of choice and economic autonomy were specific indicators of the quality of stress. The studies made such direct connections to potentiality for disease as renting vs. owning a home, job status and power, and completed level of education. The situation is so dire that there is a possibility in America that the current children will be the first generation to live shorter lives than their parents.
This information is important in terms of many of our readings in this program, but especially in relation to the idea of environmental influence, predetermination and internal will power and choice. The collective society that allows for an extreme discrepancy between wealthy and poor produces individuals of social dependency, ill health and low production value. Knowing this as well as the information provided by Damasio – how much power do we actually have over our minds and sense of self? I happily abandoned my childhood romantic notion of “destiny” and devoured many of these readings as further indication of our individual power to determine our quality and specific path of life. That being said however, the information piling up against my self help mantra is weakening the argument. It may not be a God who determines the path of life we follow, but with economics, demographic, marital status, neural fire accidents, emotional overload, fatigue, stress, broken hearts, head injuries, hormones, life experience, pollution and chemicals, a degrading natural environment, earthquakes and tsunamis; have we a free will that is a feeble force against it all?
I scoffed at the likes of Werther and Bovary for their individual futility to aquire a happy outcome. I scoffed at my own self for the same. We must be personally accountable, no? I am left again to make a wager that balances informed but uncertain caution with personal empowerment. Certainly I jest even further here to make a point – that for me, predeterminism is as undeterminable as free will. If I could settle on an answer I could apply my self to making some personal choices – but perhaps that is also merely a weakness of brain chemistry. An imbalance of Reason over Emotion or vice versa. Passion revealing itself as reactive to circumstance.

ok, ok, I wept!

•March 28, 2008 • 4 Comments

So it is post class discussion on both Elizabeth Smart By Grand Central Station I Sat down and Wept, and Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe’s The Sorrows of Young Werther.  Neither of these books

could provoke a benign reaction in anyone and myself I flung wildly between the pleasure of my own sorrows and romanticism to a peak of such utter disgust and offence that I several times flung each of these books across the room.  What led me to such outrage and lingering ill sentiments of these literary lovelies was the sickly self delight in such enterprise as unrequited love, suicidal sorrows, elite self victimization and the narration of the narcissistic nuances that plague every twenty something artist/writer/lover or otherwise.  That being said these authors gift us the pleasure of wallowing in our own recollections of our martyred self engrandisment (and I accuse you – all of you!!!).  I am guilty. I have always been guilty.  And these class discussions that tiptoe around and sneer about the wild gesticulations of the self or ego – we know why and how and what -  but we cannot overcome that it is alive and well within.  Even as a admitted self “victim” of cruel romance (as I feign a sigh and throw back my arm across my forehead – Alas!) I can rationalize and devalue the passion of oneself for oneself – the disgruntled underground man, the forever pained Werther, the self destructing Smart, the pomp of Humbert -

but I cannot and will not cast aside this voracious character. I need her for her own special merits and contributions and I hope she will one day binge write a novel that makes others shudder with revulsion in light of the petty and distasteful honesties that lie within.  So with that I am certain that Goethe and Smart have purged the Hyde we all disguise with diplomacy and a natural variance of character.  I am good, I am bad and I am a suicidal maniac lost for love.   Diagnosis pending, it will work itself out.

On Being Woman

•March 20, 2008 • 1 Comment

This is a response and rambling of thoughts provoked by the class reading of Simone DeBeauvoir’s The Second Sex as well as some ongoing musings that I have suffered over the years at the mercy of my talkative inner dialogue, otherwise known as “Note to Self”.

I must admit, or rather I cannot deny much of DeBeauvoir’s descriptions of the female experience. Of what it is to be woman now, yesterday, on this earth, of this species. On how she (woman) regards herself, on being the Other, on being subordinated and aware of being so. On love, on work, on pleasure and pain, and on the fictitious prescripted roles that are laid out for her to grow into and perform again and again.

The experience of reading such a book when I recognize myself as the “Other” that she speaks of is one that causes great interest from the point of view of study and information gathering, and one that causes pain, fatigue and demoralization from the personal perspective. DeBeauvoir has compiled a heavily historical perspective on the accumulative societal degradation of the female sex to a second class that spans the boundaries of race and culture. That being said she infuses the book with visionary statements and suggested conditions for the plausibility of a truly egalitarian gender partnership and society.

While my detailed notes are included in the Page link for this particular book, I will indulge myself in some thoughts about my own observations, frustrations and personal experience being woman.
A recurring consideration for my self is the hypothetical question – What have we lost as a society, even as a species, by subordinating women to a non participatory role in such important realms as science, art and politics? That too of any demographic that has less than an equal opportunity to participate and over any span of historical time. When you quiet any group – and in this case such a large percentage of the totality of the human race, it is not simply an issue of fairness or moral deficiency, but a great tragedy of intellectual and contributory loss. What of literature and art has gone uncreated, unseen and unconsidered in the accomplishments of man? What of war and policy and human rights and solutions and any scenario positive or negative has failed to occur in the global history of politics without the varied influence of woman? Had women been integrated into medicine earlier, would we have seen more cures, or perhaps even an entirely different trajectory of health care? The questions are futile and speculative only – but the point that resonates with me by asking the question at all is of the undeniable multiplicity of viewpoint, possibility and investment that has been lost through the imbalance of gender integration in the interests of humanity as a totality.

On a more lighthearted note, (the fault of humourous consequences), I would like to discuss the phenomenon of high heeled shoes. DeBeauvoir mentions several times in her book the problem of women willingly making choices to subordinate themselves in their lives – to identify themselves as the other, as the object, as “prey”. The donning of high heels is a celebrated icon of sexuality and desirability. Even as modern women climb the vertical hierarchy within the workplace, they choose to put forward a foot clad in patent leather and unimaginable discomfort. In light of Darwin’s natural selection theory it would seem counterintuitive to reduce your abilities, to make yourself less able to flee or to keep up with the pack in a misguided attempt to fit in, assert power, or to be desired. In my eyes, to wear such footwear is to lower your own status on the food chain. I have witnessed executive women in high end business suits hobble across the city crosswalks, several meters behind their male counterparts, and visibly in more pain. Struggling to keep up takes on new meaning when the confident male suit strides across the road and up the ladder while the female in her expensive wool skirt, fragile nylons and unstable masochistic heeled shoes clamors and wobbles in the distance, in pain, distracted and enslaved to both fashion and pandering to her added obligation to be desirable.

I have also witnessed young women in night clubs and social arenas leaning, hobbling, awkward posing and the like, in violently high footwear. This seems like it could be justifiable if you want to succeed in being plucked from the crowd by a suitor – your achievement of the night tallied by the number of approvals you get from the opposite gender, and the competitive edge you have over your own. I argue that the sickness of this scene is the obvious objectification of our own selves. As we tie ourselves up willingly to the railroad track to be saved by the stronger heroic gender of man. Feeble, helpless creatures we, tottering inches above the earth on our spindled shoes – beautiful, weak, and helpless and ready to be taken by force. Go on! We can’t run away!

And yes, I have three pairs.

My third point covers a number of conflicts of interest faced by myself, and I believe of most women today as they come to the point of deciding their own path of life. DeBeavoir’s discussion actually begins with the point of biology and the nature of the female gender as being the more reproductively obligated of the two sexes. Her very important point is that women should not be considered by their biological mechanisms, but by their totality of person. That being said, even as a woman it is very hard to separate or identify with yourself as a creature of reproductive potential – that may rightfully and reasonably choose to deny herself, or her body the act of producing child. There are many things to contend with, including the instinctual bodily urges, the societal pressures, the family expectation or simply the internal narrative developed from childhood (“when I growup and have children…”). In the class following this reading there were several comments made from women in regards to marriage, motherhood and career choices. It seems to me that there is still a very awkward second choice that has yet to be specified as a legitimate role in our society. If a woman makes the decision to forfeit family life and follow a career or otherwise do as she likes, she is still blazing into the unknown. I know many powerful women in my company who are childless and traveling the world doing exciting and rewarding things. That being said, they are remarkably similar in that they are slightly aloof, frighteningly cold and perpetually single. The men who hold similar jobs are inevitably family men who afford themselves a single income scenario and are able to bring along their family of wife and children no matter where the relocation package takes them. Somehow the women do not attempt, or are unable to follow suit. It may be a matter of personal choice, but I believe it is both a matter of plausibility to rear children and focus on a demanding career, and an issue of the current social rules and understanding between genders that they fail to find secure love and partners as do their male counterparts. I have yet to see an upper level manager of the male gender without a lovely wife and family and without a smile on his face. I have seen many attractive, strong and powerful women, with brave and independent and what I speculate as potentially lonely lives.

So as I continue my education and get further into my window of child making opportunity, my inner narrative has shifted. It seems that all too late it occurred to me that I didn’t have to make babies, and that I didn’t have to get married and “settle down”. I am faced now with some confusion over what that means. If I do want to do it, I want to do both – and the undertaking that that will represent is a level of intensity that means on or the other, or myself will suffer the extension of my means as a human being. Without many good examples or role models available, or a long history of positive representation, it feels like a brand new field of operation. Something that has to be made up from scratch. That is frightening. Even in my own mind I have subordinated my current choice, into failure or spinsterhood. Regardless of my successes and the irrelevancy of childrearing on who I am as a person. This only proves further to my self the point of DeBeavoir’s book that the nature and role of woman is a heavily crafted project of society. We have created such a powerful gender construct that the alternatives are nearly impossible to fathom.

I think I will leave it here at that, however the list goes on. This issue of disparity between sexes need not remain a rift or a war between men and women, however it remains largely unclear how we are expected, and expect each other to fulfill our roles. I can safely say that as a woman I continue to wreak havoc on my own potential for equality by enacting archaic theatrics, and by identifying with the weaker of two. I desire for the better unknown, because it is clear what is undesirable, but not yet written what is truly the equal and authentic way to exist as a woman.

faith is free

•February 12, 2008 • 2 Comments

An anonymous global protest against the workings of the “church of scientology” was brought to my attention yesterday. I could delve into the issues concerning the questionable antics of this so called church – but perhaps more interesting is the uprising of an anonymous movement of subversive internet geeks (read: you and me) who take to the street as strangers and comrades for the sake of shared dissent. The activist tactics can’t be called new, but the expedience, the reach and the “virtual anonymity” of this decentralized and democratic system of organization just might be. The internet as a communication tool has long been accused of inducing antisocial and apathetic solitary confinement amoungst the many, but could it be that it has reactivated our restless and techno saavy citizens to take to the streets in the name of protecting faith?

This is no online petition passed around by email supporting breast cancer or warning of grocery store parking lot predators. These are real people who synchronized their message and actions, and left their homes clad in disguise to represent the faceless public audience. No longer merely passive spectator, the internet chat community has made real-time history by going wireless.

Surely the media and the scientologists will point fingers and there will be backlash. Prank, religious bigotry, fickle frenzy or simply truly concerned citizens speaking out against a disconcerting organization; regardless of the motivation this was an intriguing event shedding light on the potential of the internet to facilitate and mobilize a group of
nobodies, anybodies and everybodies on behalf of a cause.

I’ve stuck myself on this image of the signage carried by a masked “anon”.faith-is-free.jpg

The words are particularly fitting in light of our critical studies of theology and culture and especially of our recent discussions surrounding the influence of a market economy on religion and science. How does this heavily publicized religion whose fundamental basis is financial affluence reflect the current status our search for universal truth? And what does the heated backlash from average income average Joe say about our continued passion on the subject?

anecdotal darwin

•January 29, 2008 • 1 Comment

So this will be the first entry of my personal journal. I will post all of my comprehensive notes and edited commentary on the readings as “pages”. I would like to keep the posts simplified to my personal experiences with the class and readings. Random trains of thoughts included.

So today I finished up with Darwin in a very popular and performative coffee shop on Main Street known as JJBean. I live for the coffee, well I live because of the coffee, and it has proven to be a favourite reading spot to alleviate myself from the distractions of procrastination at home.

Two lovely points of interest in relation to the book “On Evolution”.

The first was encountered during my short walk to my destination. Having watched a television program this weekend on dog breeding and the history and the relation to Darwin’s “Natural Selection”… I was marveling at all the small and “fancy” breeds prancing alongside their owners.

A husky black pug trotting through the snow, a fluffy strange rat like dog in a child carrier, and yet another bizarre furried friend wearing boots and a raincoat. I recognize immediately the imposition of human designs on these creatures as well as the evident reliance of these little animals on human survival mechanisms. Boots for a snowday?

Does this represent our own domestication as our social mechanisms are rendered
arbitrary in terms of survival?
Is Mr Barky von Schnauzer fufilling our desires to rear offspring? Are we lonely? or is it just amusing?

The second reflection was stirred by the inevitable distraction of some loud talking extroverts. Today I was glad for the performance as these two granted me the gift of example as I perused the final pages of “The Descent of Man”.

Two athletic and well dressed “alpha male” types were loudly exchanging mutual admiration over their recent sexual accomplishments. From the sounds of these two, I was in the midst of no less than Darwin’s most brilliantly plummaged specimens of the human species.

Bravo fellows!

Anyhow, after the self congratulatory episode, one was left behind to concentrate on his magnus opus; a screenplay of a thrilling action adventure that he would write, perform and direct! Hard at work employing his masculine height of mental faculty, this glorious creature attracted himself a mate. I watched in delight/horror as a jjBean regular (a lovely but very large, and evidently challenged woman) took the empty seat at his table and proceeded to inquire as to his employment. Now I am speaking in a rather snide manner about the situation but in relation to my book it provoked great interest. I watched his face as he struggled with empathy and morality and with great discomfort accepted her request to be seated at his table.

If as Darwin suggests, our faculties are an extension of our own developmental process of natural selection – how comical is the modern day application? Or how sad?

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.